Psychological basis
Further information: Human bonding
Psychology depicts love as a cognitive and social phenomenon. Psychologist Robert Sternberg formulated a triangular theory of love
and argued that love has three different components: intimacy,
commitment, and passion. Intimacy is a form in which two people share
confidences and various details of their personal lives, and is usually
shown in friendships and romantic love affairs. Commitment, on the other
hand, is the expectation that the relationship is permanent. The last
and most common form of love is sexual attraction and passion.
Passionate love is shown in infatuation as well as romantic love. All
forms of love are viewed as varying combinations of these three
components. Non-love does not include any of these components. Liking
only includes intimacy. Infatuated love only includes passion. Empty
love only includes commitment. Romantic love includes both intimacy and
passion. Companionate love includes intimacy and commitment. Fatuous
love includes passion and commitment. Lastly, consummate love includes
all three. [23]American psychologist Zick Rubin sought to define love by psychometrics in the 1970s. His work states that three factors constitute love: attachment, caring, and intimacy.[24] [25]Following developments in electrical theories such as Coulomb's law, which showed that positive and negative charges attract, analogs in human life were developed, such as "opposites attract." Over the last century, research on the nature of human mating has generally found this not to be true when it comes to character and personality—people tend to like people similar to themselves. However, in a few unusual and specific domains, such as immune systems, it seems that humans prefer others who are unlike themselves (e.g., with an orthogonal immune system), since this will lead to a baby that has the best of both worlds.[26] In recent years, various human bonding theories have been developed, described in terms of attachments, ties, bonds, and affinities. Some Western authorities disaggregate into two main components, the altruistic and the narcissistic. This view is represented in the works of Scott Peck, whose work in the field of applied psychology explored the definitions of love and evil. Peck maintains that love is a combination of the "concern for the spiritual growth of another," and simple narcissism.[27] In combination, love is an activity, not simply a feeling.
Psychologist Erich Fromm maintained in his book "The art of loving" that love is not merely a feeling but is also actions, and that in fact, the "feeling" of love is superficial in comparison to ones commitment to love via a series of loving actions over time.[13] In this sense, Fromm held that love is ultimately not a feeling at all, but rather is a commitment to, and adherence to, loving actions towards another, ones self, or many others, over a sustained duration.[13] Fromm also described Love as a conscious choice that in its early stages might originate as an involuntary feeling, but which then later no longer depends on those feelings, but rather depends only on conscious commitment.[13]
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar